New Year, bells and whistles
There is now an image archive, which is a receptacle for all of the images posted to the blog, and then some. That's right, look to your right!
There is now an image archive, which is a receptacle for all of the images posted to the blog, and then some. That's right, look to your right!
Posted by M Mitchell at 10:16 AM 0 comments
Well, I'm trying to be a blogger.
Not much on the page so far, but I'm hoping to put up some sort of observation or other every day.
See it here:
http://hatchetsandskewers.blogspot.com
Posted by jhcudlin at 8:46 PM 0 comments
http://subsol.c3.hu/subsol_2/index.html
http://subsol.c3.hu/subsol_2/contributors0/nimustext.html
> A Genealogy of Authors’ Property Rights
The author has not always existed. The image of the author as a wellspring of originality, a genius guided by some secret compulsion to create works of art out of a spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings, is an 18th century invention. This image continues to influence how people speak about the “great artists” of history, and it also trickles down to the more modest claims of the intellectual property regime that authors have original ideas that express their unique personality, and therefore have a natural right to own their works - or to sell their rights, if they should choose.....
ed. I thought this was a really interesting essay on the "author." We've been mulling over this in the course, "Markets, theory and collecting," but I think this conversation might find its way into other discussions. This is a good read for anyone who engages in appropriation or rails against traditional concepts of mastery and singularity. Oh whee.
Posted by M Mitchell at 12:29 PM 0 comments
In this week's CP: The Last Show at Numark.
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/arts/2006/gallery1201.html?navCenterBot
Posted by jhcudlin at 6:53 AM 0 comments